Sex offenders with learning disabilities: three responses to the challenge of service provision

Dave Hingsburger; Eileen Flavelle; Julian Yates; Kelly King-Muir; Manuela Nora; Shassha Loftman

doi:10.5042/jldob.2011.0027

Login

Welcome:
Guest

Search for:

Browse:

Product Information:

Resources:

Journal of Learning Disabilities and Offending Behaviour

ISSN: 2042-0927
Currently published as: Journal of Intellectual Disabilities and Offending Behaviour

Online from: 2010

Subject Area: Health and Social Care

Content: Latest Issue | Latest Issue RSS | Previous Issues

Options: To add Favourites and Table of Contents Alerts please take a Emerald profile

Sex offenders with learning disabilities: three responses to the challenge of service provision

Document Information:
Title:	Sex offenders with learning disabilities: three responses to the challenge of service provision
Author(s):	Dave Hingsburger, (Vita Community Living Services, Canada), Eileen Flavelle, (Waymarks, England), Julian Yates, (Waymarks, England), Kelly King-Muir, (York Central Hospital Behaviour Management Services, Canada), Manuela Nora, (Vita Community Living Services, Canada), Shassha Loftman, (York Central Hospital Behaviour Management Services, Canada)
Citation:	Dave Hingsburger, Eileen Flavelle, Julian Yates, Kelly King-Muir, Manuela Nora, Shassha Loftman, (2011) "Sex offenders with learning disabilities: three responses to the challenge of service provision", Journal of Learning Disabilities and Offending Behaviour, Vol. 2 Iss: 1, pp.42 - 54
Keywords:	Community, Intellectual disability, Learning disability, Offender, Success, Treatment
Article type:	General review
DOI:	10.5042/jldob.2011.0027 (Permanent URL)
Publisher:	Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Abstract:	This article sets out to explore three differing approaches from three agencies to supporting and treating people with a learning/intellectual disability who have sexually offended. The three agencies are: Waymarks in the United Kingdom, York Central Hospital Behaviour Management Services and Vita Community Living Services both in Ontario, Canada. Each agency provides services to a similar population of offenders with disabilities. Though each client engaged in vastly different behaviour, all clients have been identified as having sex offending history and as having a high likelihood of offending again in the future. As the organisations evolved, differing approaches to the provision of service developed. For the three agencies, it can be argued that there was a very limited range of theoretical models available when each organisation developed. Consequently each agency developed their service according to the needs and ‘best fit’ of the people they were supporting with the available resources at that time. This meant that services developed as a direct response to the need and were designed to best fit the need with the resources to hand at the time. As a result, three different models of service arose, all of which have had real success with meeting the needs of people with learning/intellectual disabilities who have sexually offended, while providing support and treatment in differing ways. This article will examine some of those differences.